User talk:MikeMol: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(Cyberbullying)
Line 113: Line 113:
As we seem to agree that "First, the message left on my user talk page by one genius" is agressive, it only remains for you to convince yourself that its authorship is ledreg for you to address your critism where it belongs.
As we seem to agree that "First, the message left on my user talk page by one genius" is agressive, it only remains for you to convince yourself that its authorship is ledreg for you to address your critism where it belongs.
--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 12:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] 12:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
: Bleh. It does seem I've misread the discussion. My apologies. This is an artifact of my not having enough time...If you guys want me to come in and try resolving the conflict, I'm going to need information prepackaged, cited and digestible. I see some hope on Kaprekar Number's talk page, in that people started moving toward a structured resolution. That's good! Please continue! Unfortunately, I'm closing on a house this week, and I'm going to have zip spare time to go over the details for a few days. I'll look at it this weekend, if 'briefs' are readily available. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 13:19, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
: Regarding signing posts...there is a note left by another user on your talk page, but on re-reading, it was on the structure of your signatures, not the lack of them. I misread it in a way that backed up a misrecollection. Again, my apologies. Re-reading your contribution history, you've even gone through and adjusted indentation of previous conversation. Whether that's good or not depends on whether it's what the original author meant, but I appreciate the attention. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 13:19, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

==How can I efficiently find out the author of a solution?==
==How can I efficiently find out the author of a solution?==
browsing the history is cumbersome
browsing the history is cumbersome