User talk:JusC: Difference between revisions

added another concern.
(added a new talk section.)
 
(added another concern.)
Line 25:
 
The examples should be fixed to agree with the task's requirements,   or,   of course,   the task's requirements could be changed.
 
This task has the same "problem/issue" as does any task concerning   ''pairs''   of primes.   Consider the limit of
  '''42'''.
<br>Now, &nbsp; '''41''' &nbsp; is a twin prime &nbsp; (and should be counted), &nbsp; but &nbsp; '''43''' &nbsp; wouldn't be counted as it isn't under the &nbsp; '''42''' &nbsp; limit.
<br>As it happens, &nbsp; when the limit is specified and the twin primes don't bracket the specified limit, &nbsp; this issue won't be exposed.
<br>But not specifying a bracketed limit doesn't belie that the examples may have that error in their programs.
 
Please feel free to undo any of my changes if you prefer another look-and-feel to the task's preamble.