Anonymous user
User talk:Hout: Difference between revisions
→None Pythonic code: Response to further evasion.
(→None Pythonic code: Response to further evasion.) |
|||
Line 301:
:: Functional programming in Python is a minority use, but useful and legitimate. I am sorry that you find it threatening and disempowering. There is no need for you to feel that way.
:: If you prefer a different style of coding please use it, but please also stop this childish campaign of harassment. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]])
<br><br>So you chose not to disagree with my assesment that your style of coding was rejected by the community.<br>
You don't disagree with my points showing two fundamental ways in which your style ignores guidelines.<br>
I asked you to name your style and after many months, you gave a link to Hindley-Miller.
You state that you use "PEP linters" but make no mention of my specific points on good Python style that you flout. Tools and/or there use can be subverted or mentioned as misdirection.
It seems that:
# You promote a style of functional programming that is different the Python idiom.
# On not persuading the Python community to adopt such a style you intend to flood RC with your coding examples and need to have them masquerade as idiomatic Python.
I have no wish to stop you adding your example code, but I think it is underhanded and subterfuge on your part that is aimed at confusing the readership as to what constitutes idiomatic Python.
* Name and disambiguate your non-idiomatic Python examples.
* Don't remove content aimed at doing the above.
--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 01:55, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
| |||