User talk:GordonCharlton: Difference between revisions

 
Line 83:
</pre>
 
:: whereas if I had gone the other route, wrapping <code>[v+}]</code> with <code>join dip join [v+] do</code> would be an option, but wouldn't that just feel like so much busywork?
 
:: In related news, I'm currently adding a new operator - <code>python</code> to allow you to to <code>exec()</code> a string of python script from within Quackery. The code to do that is trivial, but I'm spending so time giving it a workout before I document and release it. Mostly the workout consists of porting in turtle graphics from Python, and ... of course ... I'm using rationals to specify distances and angles. So I'm also experiencing the stack pressure. But... so far ... haven't felt the need to pack rationals onto nests. Anyway, a bit more testing and then I'll add it to The Book.
1,462

edits