User talk:GordonCharlton: Difference between revisions
m
→Quackery
m (→Quackery) |
|||
Line 32:
::::I would have done sets with bitwise operations. i.e.
::::<lang> Quackery [ 0 ] is empty.set ( --> set )
[ 26 bit 1 - ] constant is set.of.letters ( --> set )
Line 40:
::::and so on. Something along those lines.
::::After the "fun" of coding Quackery in a language where formatting is part of the syntax I would never seek to impose a style on any part of Quackery. Develop your own in-house rules that you are comfortable with. Mine are based solely on making the source-code look super-consistent and fit nicely on a sheet of A4 with 12pt inconsolata for the book. Now they're a habit I feel no need to get out of. Good point about words that use <code>]'[</code> though. --[[User:GordonCharlton|GordonCharlton]] ([[User talk:GordonCharlton|talk]]) 15:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
| |||