Anonymous user
User talk:Gaaijz: Difference between revisions
→Miller Rabin: 946 prime?
(Generic swap) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 46:
--[[User:DanBron|DanBron]] 16:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
== [[User_talk:DanBron#J_alphabet_gaps|J alphabet gaps]] ==
Hey. I've [http://rosettacode.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DanBron&diff=21027&oldid=20969 responded] to your [http://rosettacode.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DanBron&diff=20969&oldid=17957 inquiry] about alphabetic gaps in J's task coverage on RC.
--[[User:DanBron|DanBron]] 20:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
==Miller Rabin: 946 prime?==
Hi Gaaijz, I was doing the left truncatable prime task and started by improving the Miller Rabin primality test for Python after finding what turns out to be one of the references you cite on your [[Miller-Rabin_primality_test#Haskell|Haskell version]]. On testing 901 to 1000 for primality in my Python I noticed that the Haskell version says 946 is prime on the page? I checked the page history and found that you had the 946 from the beginning - i.e. it is not a malicious edit so I thought I'd give you a chance to look into the Haskell code rather than me just removing the 946 from your output, which was my first thought. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 05:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
| |||