User talk:Elibarzilay: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

User talk:Elibarzilay (view source)

Revision as of 23:05, 9 March 2015

754 bytes added , 9 years ago

→‎Fibonacci_n-step_number_sequences#Racket: Thanks.

Anonymous user

rosettacode>Paddy3118

Revision as of 18:25, 11 September 2014 (view source) rosettacode>Elibarzilay (→‎Sieve vs trial division.) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 23:05, 9 March 2015 (view source) rosettacode>Paddy3118 (→‎Fibonacci_n-step_number_sequences#Racket: Thanks.)
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 44: :: The three racket entries are basically one (the first) with two translations of the exact same thing to use channels & threads and to use generators. This is a website for showing different techniques for approaching a single problem, and therefore IMO this kind of thing is a perfect example of what should be encouraged. --[[User:Elibarzilay\|Elibarzilay]] ([[User talk:Elibarzilay\|talk]]) 18:25, 11 September 2014 (UTC) :::Absolutely, this is exactly what this site is for. Thanks. -- [[User:WillNess\|WillNess]] ([[User talk:WillNess\|talk]]) 06:56, 12 September 2014 (UTC) ==[[Fibonacci_n-step_number_sequences#Racket]]== A polite reminder that the Lucas series is still not attempted in Racket. Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 18:09, 9 March 2015 (UTC) :Sure it does, I just didn't want to obliterate the previous code in one big change, and you caught it in the middle of these sequence of changes... --[[User:Elibarzilay\|Elibarzilay]] ([[User talk:Elibarzilay\|talk]]) 18:36, 9 March 2015 (UTC) ::Thanks again. (And sorry for my impatience). --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118\|talk]]) 23:05, 9 March 2015 (UTC)