User talk:Dkf: Difference between revisions

(→‎Question on Nan: new section)
Line 145:
</pre>
 
Because "NaN" can be interpreted as a number, while "Booger" has no such interpretation. (My 8-year old disagrees with this, by the way). I would maintain that <tt>"set nan NaN"</tt> does not only have the exact same outcome (generates the same result) as <tt>"binary scan [binary format q nan] q nan"</tt> but that it is actually more idiomatic, more Tcl'ish, more the way of "Tcl does what you expect".[Edit: sorry about that, wasn't logged in. That was me. :-) [[User:Sgeier|Sgeier]] 01:34, 20 July 2010 (UTC)]
Anonymous user