Anonymous user
User talk:Dijkstra: Difference between revisions
→Text processing/Max licenses in use: Try not to be so rude.
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→Text processing/Max licenses in use: Parametrized SQL statement comments were appropriate though.) |
(→Text processing/Max licenses in use: Try not to be so rude.) |
||
Line 8:
On the other hand, your comments on the Parametrized SQL statement task were pretty appropriate. Again, some unnecessary edits to white space, but the comments were valid (and the correct language names used in the "incorrect" tags).--[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 20:51, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
== incorrect call ==
Dijkstra:
You wrote (concerning '''Sorting algorithms/Insertion sort'''):
Editor's summary: /* {{header|Scala}} */ Incorrect edit by Gerard
Schildberger. Please stay away from things you don't know about.
First of all, I do know about duplicate (language) headers. Someone entered an '''another''' entry for the language '''Scala''', so there were '''two''' separate
<big> <nowiki> =={{header|Scala}}== </nowiki> </big>
entries.
I merely combined the two '''Scala''' language header entries under one '''Scala''' entry, each of them under a different version. You should be chastising the person who entered it incorrectly under '''Scala''' rather than '''SASL'''. I took the (language) entry for what it was, and it was labeled '''Scala'''.
Before you start throwing around disparaging comments and pointless and defamatory suggestions, please re-think your comments and try to be more civil on Rosetta Code. If someone makes a mistake, just correct the mistake. There is no sense in being rude. Comments like yours gives Rosetta Code a bad color. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 18:05, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
| |||