Anonymous user
User talk:Dgamey: Difference between revisions
→Jcon - Language or implementation: Further clarification
(→Jcon - Language or implementation: Further clarification) |
|||
Line 16:
I've noticed that you didn't like my edit to the Jcon category page. But as I understand it, Jcon is an implementation and not a proper language. If you go to [[Jcon]] you will notice that all the content is still there (just not categorized as a language). And you yourself have included it on [[:Category:Icon_Implementations]]. Additionally the [http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/jcon/ Jcon site], the [http://www.cs.arizona.edu/icon/implver.htm Icon site] and also [[wp:Icon_(programming_language)|Wikipedia]] describe Jcon as an implementation instead of a language. So I don't really understand why you insist on listing Jcon as a language on Rosetta Code. --[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 16:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
: I'd be happier if it was an alias rather than blanked out which is what it looked like this morning. It didn't look like the information was all there. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] ([[User talk:Dgamey|talk]]) 22:13, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
::You mean the Jcon page should redirect to the Icon page: [[Jcon]]? And the same for [[:Category:Jcon]]?
::Isn't the relationship Jcon/Icon comparable to [[JRuby]]/[[Ruby]], [[Jython]]/[[Python]] or [[JTcl]]/[[Tcl]]? In all these cases there is a language page (which redirects to the category page) and if you click on "xxx Implementations" (in the section "Subcategories") you get an overview of all language implementations on RC where each implementation has its own page (but no category page).
::Copying that structure was my intention.--[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 17:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
| |||