User talk:Cloudius

Removing Kotin syntax highlighting?

Hi, just wondering if you realized the implications of changing the <lang *> tags for the Kotlin entries. The <lang> tag only controls which syntax highlighting configuration is used. It doesn't matter which one is used, but if there isn't one specifically set up for some particular language, a configuration for a similar language can be substituted. There isn't a configuration file for Kotlin, and some experimentation showed that the Scala configuration is a pretty close match, so that highlighting scheme has been used. The main effect of changing <lang scala> to <lang kotlin> in the Kotlin entries is that Kotlin no longer has syntax highlighting. --Thundergnat (talk) 13:42, 3 June 2018

Scala entry was NOT erased.

The Scala entry was NOT erased. I rolled back the edit to a previous version due to all of the unnecessary and seemingly random changes you made throughout the page to the task description and other entries. I hoped that you would realize your error and simply update the Scala entry. Apparently not. I have rolled back the other edits again but kept your Scala updates. --Thundergnat (talk) 19:20, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Destructive edits, poor attitude.

I am getting tired of your destructive edits bordering on vandalism. If examples can be improved, fine, improve them, but disparaging remarks help no-one and just make you look like a jerk. You've already been perma-banned as Siskus for similar behaviour. Continue your present course and your Cloudius account will also start accumulating bans. --Thundergnat (talk) 19:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Since Claudis seems to have a particular destructive campaign (or so it seems to me) against REXX entries), those changes are viewed by me as vandalism, or at the best, retaliatory.   I waste a lot of time either un-doing or re-editing the destructive changes.   Almost always, those changes are accompanied by other changes or an addition of a Scala entry, so I couldn't just revert the multiple updates simply by an un-do.   Siskus has been making more destructive type changes to the Wikepedia entry for Rosetta Code), which I have been updating every so often concerning the number of Rosetta Code tasks (and draft tasks), the number of programming languages, and the total number of computer programming language entries.   I had also expanded the list of some of the common and popular computer programming languages on Rosetta Code   (with links to Wikipedia computer programming languages entries).   Siskus has been deleting links, deleting some text concerning some of the most popular languages on Rosetta Code, and introduced bad (dead) or non-existant links.   -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

For future reference, any massive unnecessary edits you make to an entire page while adding a task will be summarily reverted. If you continue to do so, you will get a suspension. You have been notified.--Thundergnat (talk) 20:07, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

I am protesting, I have n't deleted no content whatsoever. I think you are overreacting. I notice that RosettaCode has a bad presentation on Apple IPhones and others. What could be done about it? I don't cope our remark about Sisjus. Sincerely yours,--Cloudius (talk) 20:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Dude. Your github repositories are public. Both your Cloudius and Siskus Rosettacode contributions are publicly viewable. Don't pretend you don't know who Siskus is. Don't worry though, I forked them in case they accidentally get deleted. --Thundergnat (talk) 21:51, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

I am afraid you are very wrong. Those mentioned accounts whether they exists or not not are not related to me. I wonder how RC comply to the EU's GDPR. I will ask our Münich authorities about that. Sincerely --Cloudius (talk) 05:56, 23 July 2018 (UTC)