Anonymous user
User talk:Cloudius: Difference between revisions
→Destructive edits, poor attitude.: added several comments.
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→Destructive edits, poor attitude.: You have NO idea who Siskus is?) |
(→Destructive edits, poor attitude.: added several comments.) |
||
Line 14:
I am getting tired of your destructive edits bordering on vandalism. If examples can be improved, fine, improve them, but disparaging remarks help no-one and just make you look like a jerk. You've already been perma-banned as [[User:Siskus|Siskus]] for similar behaviour. Continue your present course and your Cloudius account will also start accumulating bans. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 19:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
:: Since Claudis seems to have a particular destructive campaign (or so it seems to me) against REXX entries), those changes are viewed by me as vandalism, or at the best, retaliatory. I waste a lot of time either un-doing or re-editing the destructive changes. Almost always, those changes are accompanied by other changes or an addition of a '''Scala''' entry, so I couldn't just revert the multiple updates simply by an '''un-do'''. Siskus has been making more destructive type changes to the Wikepedia entry for '''Rosetta Code'''), which I have been updating every so often concerning the number of Rosetta Code tasks (and draft tasks), the number of programming languages, and the total number of computer programming language entries. I had also expanded the list of some of the common and popular computer programming languages on Rosetta Code (with links to Wikipedia computer programming languages entries). Siskus has been deleting links, deleting some text concerning some of the most popular languages on Rosetta Code, and introduced bad (dead) or non-existant links. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
For future reference, any massive unnecessary edits you make to an entire page while adding a task will be summarily reverted. If you continue to do so, you will get a suspension. You have been notified.--[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 20:07, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Line 20 ⟶ 22:
: Dude. Your github repositories are public. Both your Cloudius and Siskus Rosettacode contributions are publicly viewable. Don't pretend you don't know who Siskus is. Don't worry though, I forked them in case they accidentally get deleted. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 21:51, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
:: Claudis: Your statement about not deleting any content whatsoever isn't true. But, I don't want make this issue any more inflamatory than it already is. There is no reason to start a debate and argue the particulars. But you are definately causing a lot of work for people to undo your damage and other unnecessary blanket changes. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
:: Also, what is the purpose and/or meaning of the multiple <big> ''' <nowiki> {{trans|xxx}} </nowiki> ''' </big> statements. Was this meant to be some kind of prank or joke? Either way, it sets a bad tone for Rosetta Code. Your '''Scala''' example/entry looks nothing like the two dozen computer language entries that are listed. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
| |||