User talk:Cloudius: Difference between revisions

Line 14:

I am getting tired of your destructive edits bordering on vandalism. If examples can be improved, fine, improve them, but disparaging remarks help no-one and just make you look like a jerk. You've already been perma-banned as [[User:Siskus|Siskus]] for similar behaviour. Continue your present course and your Cloudius account will also start accumulating bans. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 19:57, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

:: Since Claudis seems to have a particular destructive campaign (or so it seems to me) against REXX entries), those changes are viewed by me as vandalism, or at the best, retaliatory.   I waste a lot of time either un-doing or re-editing the destructive changes.   Almost always, those changes are accompanied by other changes or an addition of a '''Scala''' entry, so I couldn't just revert the multiple updates simply by an '''un-do'''.   Siskus has been making more destructive type changes to the Wikepedia entry for '''Rosetta Code'''), which I have been updating every so often concerning the number of Rosetta Code tasks (and draft tasks), the number of programming languages, and the total number of computer programming language entries.   I had also expanded the list of some of the common and popular computer programming languages on Rosetta Code   (with links to Wikipedia computer programming languages entries).   Siskus has been deleting links, deleting some text concerning some of the most popular languages on Rosetta Code, and introduced bad (dead) or non-existant links.   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

:: Since Claudis seems to have a particular destructive campaign (or so it seems to me) against REXX entries), those changes are viewed by me as vandalism, or at the best, retaliatory.   I waste a lot of time either un-doing or re-editing the destructive changes.   Almost always, those changes are accompanied by other changes or an addition of a '''Scala''' entry, so I couldn't just revert the multiple updates simply by an '''un-do'''.   Siskus has been making more destructive type changes to the <strike>Wikepedia</strike> Wikipedia entry for '''Rosetta Code'''), which I have been updating every so often concerning the number of Rosetta Code tasks (and draft tasks), the number of programming languages, and the total number of computer programming language entries.   I had also expanded the list of some of the common and popular computer programming languages on Rosetta Code   (with links to Wikipedia computer programming languages entries).   Siskus has been deleting links, deleting some text concerning some of the most popular languages on Rosetta Code, and introduced bad (dead) or non-existant links.   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

I have checked it once more but I have certainly NOT changed to content. Maybe you need a new pair of glasses but IMHO terms as destructive edits or vandalism are misplaced. You are reacting also very aggressively.