User talk:Cloudius: Difference between revisions

m (→‎Scala entry was NOT erased.: added an additional computer programming language.)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10:
I also don't appreciate your unnecessary and seemingly random changes made throughout Rosetta Code tasks and the task decription and other entries, especially under the guise of "adding a '''Scala''' entry".   If you going to   ''add''   an entry, don't make a mass (or even a few) of other changes to seeming random language entries (or the task's preamble) without stating what was being done (or accomplished), and hopefully, you would would include the reasons for making the changes.   Edit-wars such as this   (just undoing someone else's undoing of your useless or damaging changes)   shouldn't be allowed here on Rosetta Code, but perhaps a Rosetta Code admininstrator(s) could step in and voice their concerns of your type of behavior.   I've reverted many of your useless changes (regarding the Rosetta Code task ''Chebyshev coefficients''), and you just undid my undoing (and in another case, you twice undid my undoing of my restoration of your useless or damaging changes), and almost always, without comment or a summary.   Now, after your last undoing of my restoration, you have become childish and starting with snide remarks and name-calling.   There is no need for being spiteful, ill tempered, or ill behaved such as you are demonstrating.   If you want to discuss such boorish behavior, leaving such comments in a (change) summary is not the place for being snippy, insulting, or demeaning.   Your unfortunate ill-tempered remarks cannot be elided.   These unnecessary and random changes are just wasting everybody else's time and effort (in undoing your updates and/or damage), and also you are (unfortunately) demonstrating to the world what Rosetta Code is   NOT   about.   You are also demonstrating behaviour very similar to another bygone user who wasted a lot of everyone's precious time.   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
 
: I see you are up to your old tricks, saying you're ''adding'' a '''Scala''' entry &nbsp; (<strike>seven</strike> teneleven times today, on or about August 22, 2019), &nbsp; then making random changes to other (following) entries, mainly '''Sidef''' &nbsp; and &nbsp; '''Tcl''', &nbsp; but since you're doing a global edit, &nbsp; some changes are hard to see what other entries are being changed/modified. &nbsp; If you are saying that you're added a '''Scala''' entry, then keep your changes to '''Scala'''. &nbsp; Please re-read the previous paragraph. &nbsp; &nbsp; -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 21:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 
== Destructive edits, poor attitude. ==
Line 48:
==Hi Claudius==
Maybe it's time for us to say "Thank you, but no thanks". You seem to be a divisive force in the community not willing to join in. After changing an entry which seemed to be an unsubtle attempt to lable other entries dumb. I thought a discussion might be enough. But not now. Do the mature thing and move on.
 
==Scala categories==
Hi, I see you have created several Scala category pages today. would you tell me what you intend doing with them as I can't remember such being in place for other languages and would like to understand more. <br>
Thanks --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 20:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
 
Hi Patrick, it's Work in Progress. I'am intending to map to explicit as well as implicit libraries, also as part of my research at the Frauenthaler Institut in Zürich (CH).
 
What others have contributed is their business, although some using a lot of whitespace which makes the webpage terrible especially as been seen on a smartphone. E.g. the RC search result page of a word like "file".
Sincerly --[[User:Cloudius|Cloudius]] ([[User talk:Cloudius|talk]]) 10:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Anonymous user