User talk:Benji: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Random) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==random?== |
==random?== |
||
Hi Benji, why the change to the Python random example? Does random.randint always use the OS's random number generator? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 09:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC) |
Hi Benji, why the change to the Python random example? Does random.randint always use the OS's random number generator? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 09:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC) |
||
==Obscuring example== |
|||
Hi Benji. If an example is wrong then it's good to fix the example. If you have a new way of completing the task than the example given then you might split the entry, adding explanations as well as another entry, but otherwise if there is a prior entry for a task then it is usually left alone. I reverted your edits to [[Range extraction#Python]] for that last reason; (but also because the Python example was written as part of defining the task too). --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 10:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:57, 28 December 2013
random?
Hi Benji, why the change to the Python random example? Does random.randint always use the OS's random number generator? --Paddy3118 (talk) 09:04, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
Obscuring example
Hi Benji. If an example is wrong then it's good to fix the example. If you have a new way of completing the task than the example given then you might split the entry, adding explanations as well as another entry, but otherwise if there is a prior entry for a task then it is usually left alone. I reverted your edits to Range extraction#Python for that last reason; (but also because the Python example was written as part of defining the task too). --Paddy3118 (talk) 10:57, 28 December 2013 (UTC)