User talk:Arjun sunel/Solvability of a 3x3x3 Rubik's Cube State?: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "== WTF? == This article seems to not be totally uninteresting but should it really be on Rosetta-Code?? Isn't that some kind of elaborate spam? --~~~~")
 
Line 2: Line 2:


This article seems to not be totally uninteresting but should it really be on Rosetta-Code?? Isn't that some kind of elaborate spam? --[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] ([[User talk:Grondilu|talk]]) 12:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
This article seems to not be totally uninteresting but should it really be on Rosetta-Code?? Isn't that some kind of elaborate spam? --[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] ([[User talk:Grondilu|talk]]) 12:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

:I would make a page Rubiks Cube which explained the cube and it motions: including a naming scheme for each square, a scheme for describing moves. As children of that I would add tasks based on Rubik's Cube which can be solved by a computer. Three suggested here are: Permutation Parity Test; Corner Parity Test; and Edge Parity Test. I think each of these would be worthy of a task in their own right, and others could be added.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 13:31, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:31, 13 April 2013

WTF?

This article seems to not be totally uninteresting but should it really be on Rosetta-Code?? Isn't that some kind of elaborate spam? --Grondilu (talk) 12:11, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

I would make a page Rubiks Cube which explained the cube and it motions: including a naming scheme for each square, a scheme for describing moves. As children of that I would add tasks based on Rubik's Cube which can be solved by a computer. Three suggested here are: Permutation Parity Test; Corner Parity Test; and Edge Parity Test. I think each of these would be worthy of a task in their own right, and others could be added.--Nigel Galloway (talk) 13:31, 13 April 2013 (UTC)