User:Siskus: Difference between revisions

→‎flagging of REXX entries: possible meaning added (PARI/GP instead of PARI/GL). -- ~~~~
(→‎flagging of REXX entries: opinion seconded (and some minor corrections))
(→‎flagging of REXX entries: possible meaning added (PARI/GP instead of PARI/GL). -- ~~~~)
Line 33:
Counts are accurate as of the time of the program execution and the numbers are obtained from the CATEGORY page and filter through a list of languages (from the ''language'' page).
 
PARI/GP is in the ranking and it's ranked '''30''' with 358 members. &nsbp; Did you mean PARI/GP instead of PARI/GL?   There is no PARI/GL in the Rosetta Code list of languages. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 09:28, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
PARI/GL '''is''' indeed, in the ranking. It is ranked '''30''' with 358 members.
 
As for the ''need review flagging'', what is or isn't unnecessary HTML is a matter of opinion, and there is no need to flag entries on your beliefs that there is too much. What is important is the rendering of the HTML. Is it presentable? Is it readable? Is it viewable? Is it accurate?