Anonymous user
User:Shyam Has Your Anomaly Mitigated: Difference between revisions
→My Favourite Language Families
No edit summary |
|||
Line 49:
<!--
<br>My selection criteria for projects is productivity (planning, intelligence amplification, augmented learning), then accessibility (fawlty senses, linguistic translation), then waves (brain waves, echolocation sound waves, continuous data), then particles (pixelated graphics, discrete data), then robotics (monkeyoid typists, seeing-eye dogoid computer visionaries, universal translator speech recognisers, birdoid planes, beeoid drones, antoid cars, elephantoid buses, dolphinoid boats, whaleoid submarines, animaloid soldiers, humanoid soldiers), then security (world domination).
-->
'')''
<br>The fourmost foremost productive programming language families based on scientific research papers, and empirical evidence:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!prolog
|language processing
|language-based user interface
|optimal exhaustive bruteforcing
|-
!perl
|text processing
|text-based user interface
|unix(one_liners, glue_code)
|-
!lisp
|list processing
|metaprogramming
|prototyping
|-
!haskell
|multiprocessing
|formal methods
|lazy producer-consumer heuristics
|-
!<s>smalltalk</s>
|<s>state processing</s>
|<s>graphical user interface</s>
|
|-
|}
''( commented treasures''
<!--
smalltalk may be a productive language but my opinions of object-oriented have changed:
*object-oriented programming: based on the ℝ world; ℝ is mathematically imperfect (bumblebees, the leaning tower of lire, brachistochrone,..)
*literate programming : based on ℕ languages; ℕ languages are informal/fawlty
-->
'')''
| |||