Revision as of 00:39, 7 December 2009 (view source) rosettacode>Rldrenth (→‎What Languages Should You Learn) ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:07, 30 December 2009 (view source) rosettacode>Rldrenth mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1: {{notmylangbegin\|Languages I abstain from}} {{notmylang\|Ruby\|too cryptic, Perlish}}▼ {{notmylang\|Cobol\|just plain ugly}}▼ {{notmylang\|Ada\|excess syntax & keywords}} ▲{{notmylang\|Cobol\|just plain ugly}} ▲{{notmylang\|Ruby\|too cryptic, Perlish}} {{mylangend}} {{mylangbegin\|Favorite Languages}} Line 16: {{mylang\|C++\|advanced}} {{mylang\|Delphi\|rusty}} {{mylang\|Java\|~~beginner~~novice}} {{mylang\|JavaScript\|when need to}} {{mylang\|Lua\|~~novice~~beginner}} {{mylang\|ME10 macro\|intermediate}} {{mylang\|Perl\|novice}} Line 57: ===What popular modern language should you not bother to learn?=== Visual Basic or VB.Net. -It's on the way out, being supplanted by C#, Python, and occasionally C. There's ~~not~~no longer a good reason ~~for~~to ~~its~~use ~~existance~~it ~~anymore~~on new projects. Python is easier for quick apps. C# would use the same development environment and is better for significant projects. If you need an exe, a C program will give you that. ~~same development environment and is better for significant projects. If you need an exe, a C program~~ ~~will give you that.~~ What about C++? - I still like C++. But I think there are other languages that will provide higher programmer productivity in practice. Try D, Objective-C, Java, or Delphi instead.

User:Rldrenth: Difference between revisions

User:Rldrenth (view source)

Revision as of 03:07, 30 December 2009