User:Gerard Schildberger: Difference between revisions

m
changed font size for blurbs on some computer programming languages.
m (added a computer programming language.)
m (changed font size for blurbs on some computer programming languages.)
Line 56:
 
 
<big> ACP and PARS </big> &nbsp; ─── I was part of the team that first implemented the Passenger Airline Reservation System for a hotel/motel business &nbsp; ─── a motel room is just a huge seat (chair) with a bed, alarm clock, TV (color!), ice bucket, and a personal bathroom (tub & shower) with soap, shampoo, and towels, &nbsp; ··· &nbsp; but doesn't fly anywhere. <br><br><br>
 
<big> APL </big> &nbsp; ─── still bemuses me. &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; I once read in "The IBM Journal" on an article on '''APL''' that the article's author wrote a 2-line APL program that validated chess moves (except for queening and castling). &nbsp; He said he could condense the 2-liner into a 1-liner, &nbsp; but then it would be harder to read. &nbsp; &nbsp; Funniest thing I ever read in an "IBM Journal" article. <br><br><br>
 
<big> BPL </big> &nbsp; ─── (<u>B</u>asic <u>P</u>rogramming <u>L</u>anguage) &nbsp; was a Honeywell subset of the PL/I language &nbsp; (I was one of a dozen or so programmers/authors). <br><br><br>
 
<big> HPL </big> &nbsp; ─── (<u>H</u>oneywell <u>P</u>rogramming <u>L</u>anguage) &nbsp; was a subset of PL/I &nbsp; (similar to above) &nbsp; and was to be used for Honeywell's new computer &nbsp; (code name unknown) &nbsp; ─── &nbsp; it was never built, but from what I could glean from the specs, it would have used HPL as it's native [machine] language and seemed to have some of the characteristics of IBM's '''FS''' system &nbsp; (and apparently, suffered the same fate). <br><br><br>
 
<big> IBM 407 plugboard </big> &nbsp; ─── can't be many of us plugboard programmers left. <br><br><br>
Kingston FORTRAN II &nbsp; ─── (locally called FORTRAN 2.5) &nbsp; was for the IBM 1620 with a lot of FORTRAN IV capability. &nbsp; It supported floating point arithmetic even if the (optional) hardware feature for floating point wasn't installed. <br><br><br>
 
<big> Kingston FORTRAN II </big> &nbsp; ─── (locally called FORTRAN 2.5) &nbsp; was for the IBM 1620 with a lot of FORTRAN IV capability. &nbsp; It supported floating point arithmetic even if the (optional) hardware feature for floating point wasn't installed. <br><br><br>
Viatron FORTRAN IV &nbsp; ─── was the FORTRAN compiler for the Viatron home computer (I was one of the CUC authors of the compiler and libraries; CUC was the ''Computer Usage Company'', at that time, the oldest software company in the USA) &nbsp; and had it's fingers in writing some of the routines for IBM's TSS, which enabled CUC to write the first non─IBM book on writhing/coding assembler for the IBM/360. <br><br><br>
 
<big> Viatron FORTRAN IV </big> &nbsp; ─── was the FORTRAN compiler for the Viatron home computer (I was one of the CUC authors of the compiler and libraries; CUC was the ''Computer Usage Company'', at that time, the oldest software company in the USA) &nbsp; and had it's fingers in writing some of the routines for IBM's TSS, which enabled CUC to write the first non─IBM book on writhing/coding assembler for the IBM/360. <br><br><br>
 
I also update the &nbsp; [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosetta_Code <u> (English) Wikipedia page for &nbsp; <big>''Rosetta Code''</big></u>] &nbsp; from time to time.