Ternary logic: Difference between revisions

m
Line 2,779:
Note that this implementation is a special case of "[[wp:fuzzy logic|fuzzy logic]]" (using a limited set of values).
 
Note that while <code>>.</code> and <code><.</code> could be used for boolean operations instead of J's <code>+.</code> and <code>*.</code>, the identity elements for >. and <. are not boolean1 valuesand 0, but are negative and positive infinity. See also: [[wp:Boolean ring|Boolean ring]]
 
Note that we might instead define values between 0 and 1 to represent independent probabilities:
6,962

edits