Template talk:Works with: Difference between revisions
→Regarding standardized languages: de facto, de jure, de insania
(→Regarding standardized languages: scattered but related toughts/doubts) |
(→Regarding standardized languages: de facto, de jure, de insania) |
||
Line 10:
: Just thoughts in my succint speach!
:: —[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 14:34, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
:: I don't want to get overcomplicated and overspecific on it, because down that road lay madness, and I don't need any more of that. I'm only trying to address the stuff that's easy to roughly address. The particular case I'm interested in at the moment is where the ''de facto'' standard doesn't very far from the ''de jure'' standard, so that one could specify the ''de jure'' standard and indicate deviant implementations if necessary. For cases where the ''de facto'' differs broadly from the ''de jure'', I don't see a long-term effective solution. I ''am'' getting worried about Python 2.x vs Python 3.x, and Perl5 vs Perl6 is a case which has already seen presentation on the site. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 14:49, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
| |||