Template talk:Strings: Difference between revisions
(added a talk topic.) |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I tried to include Rosetta Code tasks that deal with character strings that included numeric digits, even though some (or maybe most) Rosetta Code language examples/entries may have elected to treat/handle the character string as numeric digits (i.e., as a number). The inclusion should probably include sequences that are, in fact, sequences of various flavors of character strings, whether or not most of the strings deal with the numeric part of a string. |
I tried to include Rosetta Code tasks that deal with character strings that included numeric digits, even though some (or maybe most) Rosetta Code language examples/entries may have elected to treat/handle the character string as numeric digits (i.e., as a number). The inclusion should probably include sequences that are, in fact, sequences of various flavors of character strings, whether or not most of the strings deal with the numeric part of a string. |
||
Two related tasks for ''strings'' could be: |
Two related tasks for the ''strings template'' could be: |
||
::* [[Four_is_magic|four is magic]] |
::* [[Four_is_magic|four is magic]] |
||
::* [[Four_is_the_number_of_letters_in_the_...|four is the number of letters in the ....]] |
::* [[Four_is_the_number_of_letters_in_the_...|four is the number of letters in the ....]] |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
I think it looks better without the ; on each sub-heading, but I'll not argue about it. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 13:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC) |
|||
: I think you are right. Removed. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 13:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC) |
|||
[[Range_modifications]] possibly, in Remove / replace, maybe? --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 23:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC) |
|||
I think we need a new section for "Tedious, pointless, and unimaginative dictionary tasks"... --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 19:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 19:56, 12 February 2021
Many Rosetta Code tasks deal with (character) strings, whether that includes character strings that happen to be numeric (that is, decimal digits, or possibly in other bases).
I tried to include Rosetta Code tasks that deal with character strings that included numeric digits, even though some (or maybe most) Rosetta Code language examples/entries may have elected to treat/handle the character string as numeric digits (i.e., as a number). The inclusion should probably include sequences that are, in fact, sequences of various flavors of character strings, whether or not most of the strings deal with the numeric part of a string.
Two related tasks for the strings template could be:
Another class of related tasks would be various forms of encryption/decryption and encoding/decoding. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 22:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
I think it looks better without the ; on each sub-heading, but I'll not argue about it. --Pete Lomax (talk) 13:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
- I think you are right. Removed. --Thundergnat (talk) 13:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Range_modifications possibly, in Remove / replace, maybe? --Pete Lomax (talk) 23:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
I think we need a new section for "Tedious, pointless, and unimaginative dictionary tasks"... --Pete Lomax (talk) 19:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)