Template talk:Strings: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
added a talk topic. |
|||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 5:
I tried to include Rosetta Code tasks that deal with character strings that included numeric digits, even though some (or maybe most) Rosetta Code language examples/entries may have elected to treat/handle the character string as numeric digits (i.e., as a number). The inclusion should probably include sequences that are, in fact, sequences of various flavors of character strings, whether or not most of the strings deal with the numeric part of a string.
Two related tasks for the ''strings template'' could be:
::* [[Four_is_magic|four is magic]]
::* [[Four_is_the_number_of_letters_in_the_...|four is the number of letters in the ....]]
:::::::::::::::::::: -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)▼
▲
I think it looks better without the ; on each sub-heading, but I'll not argue about it. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 13:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
: I think you are right. Removed. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 13:35, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
[[Range_modifications]] possibly, in Remove / replace, maybe? --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 23:01, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
I think we need a new section for "Tedious, pointless, and unimaginative dictionary tasks"... --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 19:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
| |||