Anonymous user
Template talk:Output?: Difference between revisions
→Don't do this: Not the norm, but useful.
(Please don't make showing output normative) |
(→Don't do this: Not the norm, but useful.) |
||
Line 16:
In other cases, I wish that it be left up to the discretion of the task, and there not be a RC-wide policy of including output. —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 21:17, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
:I don't believe it should be the norm for RC either, but I do think it has advantages in catching wrong implementations ''especially'' where the task goal is to give short, precise output such as in [[Range extraction]] amongst others, where, with the best will in the world, it can be difficult to see that last t to be crossed in ones implementation. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 21:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
| |||