Template talk:Output?: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
(Please don't make showing output normative) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::::I tried again. It's getting kind of bulky again. I wish I could think of a more concise way to put it. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 17:47, 16 August 2011 (UTC) |
::::I tried again. It's getting kind of bulky again. I wish I could think of a more concise way to put it. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 17:47, 16 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::::I just gave it a go too. Feel free to revert the change if you don't like it. --[[User:Arm|Arm]] 15:58 16/08/2011 (GMT-3) |
:::::I just gave it a go too. Feel free to revert the change if you don't like it. --[[User:Arm|Arm]] 15:58 16/08/2011 (GMT-3) |
||
== Don't do this == |
|||
Please, please, don't make showing output normative. I have noticed a trend towards this on RC, and I dislike it. In particular, the "beta" version of this template says "It is good practice to show the output of a program whenever there is output.". I disagree that this is good practice. |
|||
In particular, I consider it useless clutter to show output per-program on tasks ''where the output is specified so precisely as to be identical across all correct programs'' — the output need only be shown once, in the task description. |
|||
In other cases, I wish that it be left up to the discretion of the task, and there not be a RC-wide policy of including output. —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 21:17, 16 August 2011 (UTC) |