Anonymous user
Template talk:Draft task: Difference between revisions
Four sounds good ...
(There are a few rules of thumb; here are mine) |
(Four sounds good ...) |
||
Line 5:
: I tend to feel that “enough” implementations is about four, provided they're properly distinct from each other. Thus a C solution that compiled and worked with C++ wouldn't be distinct, but two solutions that are idiomatic in both languages (and thus very unlikely to be the same due to the way those languages have diverged) would indeed satisfy. Mind you, it's even better if you've got Haskell and (at least one of) Ruby/Perl/Python/Tcl solutions as well; with those, it's getting to the point where it's reasonable to assume that the task is practically achievable across a wide range of languages. (I choose 4 because that's the point where a TOC gets added automatically.) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:55, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
:: Four sounds good, but it should still be a "touchy-feely thing", as sometimes you write the task, and because you think it is so simple/straight-forward/well-done, you might ''choose'' to have it as a task before the four mark; and vice-versa their may still be issues after four implementation languages. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 18:59, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
| |||