Anonymous user
Template talk:Allows: Difference between revisions
Clarifying my position
(That was my initial suggestion) |
(Clarifying my position) |
||
Line 6:
::: I think Coderjoe was trying to say that the template could be defined to use "Capability:{{{1}}}", instead of as "{{{1}}}". That way, the "Capability:" could be left out of the template argument. (Just clarifying; don't mind me.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 19:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
:::: Given that this is exactly what I have suggested in the initial comment, I doubt that it's what Coderjoe meant. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 19:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
::::: Right. My question was: if everything (in these three properties) was the name of a capability, does the "Capability" part need to be in the value? Ce brings up using it to disambiguate pages for the capability from another page by the same name, using a pseudo-namespace. Do these capabilities need pages? SMW has types other than "Page". --[[User:Coderjoe|Coderjoe]] 19:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
| |||