Template talk:Allows: Difference between revisions
Clarifying question
No edit summary |
(Clarifying question) |
||
Line 4:
:: I don't have strong feelings about that prefix; it's certainly not needed to ''identify'' capabilities. I just thought it would be a good idea to prevent naming conflict from the beginning by using the prefix. But I wouldn't care too much if the prefix were removed (it would increase the risk of naming conflicts, of course).
:: If I'm the only one considering that prefix a good idea, it may well go. In that case, the change should probably be done early, so that the work required isn't too large. In any case, it would be interesting to know what others think about the prefix. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 16:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
::: I think Coderjoe was trying to say that the template could be defined to use "Capability:{{{1}}}", instead of as "{{{1}}}". That way, the "Capability:" could be left out of the template argument. (Just clarifying; don't mind me.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 19:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
| |||