Template talk:Allows: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(Clarifying question)
(That was my initial suggestion)
Line 5: Line 5:
:: If I'm the only one considering that prefix a good idea, it may well go. In that case, the change should probably be done early, so that the work required isn't too large. In any case, it would be interesting to know what others think about the prefix. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 16:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
:: If I'm the only one considering that prefix a good idea, it may well go. In that case, the change should probably be done early, so that the work required isn't too large. In any case, it would be interesting to know what others think about the prefix. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 16:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
::: I think Coderjoe was trying to say that the template could be defined to use "Capability:{{{1}}}", instead of as "{{{1}}}". That way, the "Capability:" could be left out of the template argument. (Just clarifying; don't mind me.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 19:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
::: I think Coderjoe was trying to say that the template could be defined to use "Capability:{{{1}}}", instead of as "{{{1}}}". That way, the "Capability:" could be left out of the template argument. (Just clarifying; don't mind me.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 19:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
:::: Given that this is exactly what I have suggested in the initial comment, I doubt that it's what Coderjoe meant. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 19:46, 18 August 2010 (UTC)