Anonymous user
Talk:Zeckendorf number representation: Difference between revisions
Talk:Zeckendorf number representation (view source)
Revision as of 20:02, 11 October 2012
, 11 years ago→Consensus on the sequence: Slippery!
m (→Perl 6, wrong fib sequence: bad newline) |
(→Consensus on the sequence: Slippery!) |
||
Line 9:
::Task specific 2 is still ambiguous for the case of ZR(1). The sequences {1} and {1, 1} both satisfy the criterion of the greatest of the sequence being a number less than or equal to the number for conversion, but the greedy rule leads the first to produce ZR(1) = 1 and the second ZR(1) = 10. —[[User:Sonia|Sonia]] 17:51, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
This is me asking for help. Help!<br>
Anyone care to suggest a rework of the task that would be better. Or would a re-wording allowing different starting conditions so long as they were stated suffice? Technically the task is still draft but it would be good if any change meant minor or no change to the existing solutions of others. P.S. Thanks Sonia, Ledrug, TimToady for the comments so far. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 20:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
==Perl 6, wrong fib sequence==
| |||