Talk:XXXX redacted: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (→overkill implies partial: Implementation detail) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17:
::: Like I said, implementation detail. Apparently you were able to decipher the desired operations. The task '''specifically''' states '''"You are not required to use those, or any abbreviation."''' How you refer to the different operations should have no bearing on how they work. The task header spells out what a Whole word is, what a Partial word is, and what an Overkill operation is. The same operation by a different name is effectively the same operation. Pointless, irrelevant constraints is exactly what makes me aggravated with some other tasks. You made your nomenclature clear, I don't disagree with it, but I also don't think that is the '''only''' way to get the point across. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 13:03, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
:::: Now that you've had a fortnight to subconsciously dwell on this, can I politely ask you to reconsider whether "Whole word, overkill" is simply nonsense. When you ask "What is the difference between 'Whole word' and 'Whole word, overkill'? they should be exactly the same", my thoughts are still "Eh?", either it is whole word and there is ''no'' overkill, or there ''is'' some overkill and therefore it is ''not'' the same as whole word. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 13:00, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
| |||