Talk:XML/DOM serialization: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Attributes?) |
(→Attributes: Suppose so) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Attributes == |
== Attributes == |
||
Shouldn't the task be extended such that the document contains at least one attribute? -- [[User:Wmeyer|Wmeyer]] 00:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC) |
Shouldn't the task be extended such that the document contains at least one attribute? -- [[User:Wmeyer|Wmeyer]] 00:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Yes in principle, but it's a big round of breaking of existing examples to do. Is it that important? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:32, 13 January 2010
Which Equivalence?
When we produce XML, what degree of equivalence to the sample is required? According to which normalization rules should the equivalence be performed?
I ask because none of the language samples that describe what output they actually produce generate the exact text in the task description. —Dkf 08:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Attributes
Shouldn't the task be extended such that the document contains at least one attribute? -- Wmeyer 00:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes in principle, but it's a big round of breaking of existing examples to do. Is it that important? –Donal Fellows 10:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)