Talk:Word frequency: Difference between revisions
m
→Communications of the ACM June 1986 Volume 29 Number 6
(→Communications of the ACM June 1986 Volume 29 Number 6: Words with apostophes) |
|||
Line 1,113:
:::The task author has never run the cited references using the mandated input.
::The original author does not seem to be taking any further interest in this task. Perhaps you would like to update the description and mark the Clojure and Python examples as wrong to resolve this.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 13:41, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
::Knuth's paper clarifies another issue 'Let us agree that a word is a sequence of one or more contiguous letters; “Bentley” is a word, but ain't isn’t'.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 14:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
| |||