Talk:Word frequency: Difference between revisions
→Communications of the ACM June 1986 Volume 29 Number 6
(→Communications of the ACM June 1986 Volume 29 Number 6: Not wrong.) |
|||
Line 1,117:
::: That's a lot of good detective work, but if the task leaves the definition of what a word is up to the example writer, then the Python can't be wrong. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:38, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
::::The task defines a word as a sequence of contiguous letters (as in McIlroy's solution) without defining what a letter is. How about leaving it up to the sample writer what a letter is? Samples could then use the Unicode definition or the ASCII definition (or even some other character set) as convenient? --[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 18:09, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
| |||