Anonymous user
Talk:Word frequency: Difference between revisions
→Communications of the ACM June 1986 Volume 29 Number 6: Not wrong.
(→Communications of the ACM June 1986 Volume 29 Number 6: Not wrong.) |
|||
Line 1,115:
::Knuth's paper clarifies another issue 'Let us agree that a word is a sequence of one or more contiguous letters; “Bentley” is a word, but ain't isn’t'.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 14:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
::: That's a lot of good detective work, but if the task leaves the definition of what a word is up to the example writer, then the Python can't be wrong. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:38, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
| |||