Talk:Window creation: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:Window creation (view source)

Revision as of 12:58, 6 February 2010

262 bytes added , 14 years ago

m

moved Talk:Creating a Window to Talk:Window creation

Anonymous user

rosettacode>UnderBot

Revision as of 03:00, 10 February 2007 (view source) 12.201.61.241 (talk) No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 12:58, 6 February 2010 (view source) rosettacode>UnderBot m (moved Talk:Creating a Window to Talk:Window creation)
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 32: :::I don't want to lose the functionality offered by the SDL example. In systems like DirectX, OpenGL and SDL, there may not be a direct abstraction corresponding to things like Window Size and resizability. Perhaps that could be split off into another task? --[[User:Short Circuit\|Short Circuit]] 09:01, 1 February 2007 (EST) ::: I made a task along the lines of something of a "[http://www.rosettacode.org/wiki/Simple_Windowed_Application basic window that actually has a function]" and filled in the IDL and Tcl examples. Have a look at it ;-) [[User:Sgeier\|Sgeier]] 23:05, 19 February 2007 (EST) ===Hmm=== I don't necessarily know if that's correct. If we take the name of the site, Rosetta stone, to be some indication of purpose, ~~than~~then these little snippets are far from useless. They serve as a way to compare doing something, simple or complex, in a variety of different languages. I think it's quite educational, and pretty entertaining, to see the vast differences even on this small question. Besides, ~~theres~~there's no reason why you can't add your question there as another one. But understand its going to be far easier to get users to contribute snippets than skeletons. Maybe what you actually have there are 8 different questions? Then you could draw the answers together to form your own skeleton. Line 42 ⟶ 44: :I agree with Frater, snippets are better than skeletons, the purpose of this site (in my opinion) is to just see tid bits of code to get a person going. Not a full blown app. Once the person has an idea of what to do then he/she can go to the language/library's website for further information. --[[User:Adonis\|Adonis]] 16:13, 24 January 2007 (EST) ==Cite Notes==▼ Removed from C+SDL example.▼ Submitted by Calvin Arndt 2007-01-21 2:49pm CST▼ :Thanks Calvin! --[[User:Short Circuit\|Short Circuit]] 19:32, 23 January 2007 (EST)▼ ==hmmm2== Line 61 ⟶ 55: Both of these, while certainly doable, would take away from the simple task of getting a window open with SDL They would require lenghty code and would make this tasks page monsterous in size for even just a few examples. Calvin ~~==next note==~~ ▲==Cite Notes== ▲Removed from C+SDL example. ▲ Submitted by Calvin Arndt 2007-01-21 2:49pm CST ▲:Thanks Calvin! --[[User:Short Circuit\|Short Circuit]] 19:32, 23 January 2007 (EST)