Talk:Wave function collapse: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 2:
== Vote for deletion ==
We have been getting a bunch of new tasks lately with absolutely no verbiage or explanation of algorithm on the "task" page other than a link to "See the algorithm over there". If you can't be bothered to put summary a explanation of the algorithm, and better yet, an reference implementation, enough for a knowledgeable person to figure out how to do it, it comes across as a low effort attempt to drive traffic to somebodies monetized video / page. Not what RosettaCode is about. As it stands, I vote for deletion on this task. I have similar low opinions of [[Boyer-Moore string search]], [[Knuth-Morris-Pratt string search]] and [[Execute_Computer/Zero]‎], but those are issues for other discussion pages. --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 21:51, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
: Seconded. Also added a clarify task tag to the main page. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 02:44, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
 
I've made this task before this video, but based on other videos. https://github.com/darkfrei/love2d-lua-tests/blob/main/wave-function-collapse/main.lua
Sorry that I cannot good explain this task, but just added the link to good description. --[[User:Darkfrei|Darkfrei]] ([[User talk:Darkfrei|talk]]) 22:09, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
7,794

edits