Talk:Van der Corput sequence: Difference between revisions

Talk:Van der Corput sequence (view source)

81 bytes added , 3 years ago

m

Anonymous user

Revision as of 21:24, 4 October 2020 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m (added a (forced) TOC.) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 21:30, 4 October 2020 (view source) rosettacode>Gerard Schildberger m (→‎displaying of terms: added whitespace.)
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 10: == displaying of terms == In every reference I've looked at, the 2nd term of the van der Corput ~~sequenct~~sequence (for base two) is '''.1''' ~~<br> .1~~ ~~<br>~~ (not) '''.10000000''' <br><br>I suggest that trailing zeroes illegitimatizes the terms. <br><br>I suggest that trailing zeroes illegitimize the terms. Mathematically, of course, .1 is equal to .100 (except to an engineer, where trailing zeroes signify more precision). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] 03:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC)▼ ▲~~<br><br>I suggest that trailing zeroes illegitimize the terms.~~ Mathematically, of course,   '''.1'''   is equal to   '''.100'''   (except to an engineer, where trailing zeroes signify more precision).     -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger\|Gerard Schildberger]] 03:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC) ==Generation of the image in the task description==