Talk:Use another language to call a function: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
: I think the reason in this case was to intentionally call out a non-trivial area of language compatibility. Being able to pass strings back and forth between languages (especially where some of the languages have very different ways of exposing strings to programmers) is a touchy subject. That said, it may be appropriate to split the task between trivial and non-trivial scenarios. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC) |
: I think the reason in this case was to intentionally call out a non-trivial area of language compatibility. Being able to pass strings back and forth between languages (especially where some of the languages have very different ways of exposing strings to programmers) is a touchy subject. That said, it may be appropriate to split the task between trivial and non-trivial scenarios. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
Is the pipe option of pico lisp fair play? It's a ubiquitous, and easy solution.-- |
Is the pipe option of pico lisp fair play? It's a ubiquitous, and easy solution.--[[User:Lambertdw|Dave]] 04:43, 14 March 2012 (UTC) |