Anonymous user
Talk:Use a REST API: Difference between revisions
Suggested using RosettaCodes own REST API
(→Petition to delete this task: task renamed) |
(Suggested using RosettaCodes own REST API) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 63:
:Task renamed to something more generic. I don't want to sound petulant or like I'm picking on the latest Wren submission, but of course I'm probably about to do both.
:I don't think it is a good thing, to put it kindly, to have untested entries on rosettacode that nobody can run, not even the original author. I am aware there is at least one Phix entry equally at fault. I found an alternative for Phix, but not about to advocate that specific site, there are plenty of others out there. In an ideal world there would be another "Host a REST API" rosettacode task this could be tested against, even if just localhost that would do, I suppose. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 14:48, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
=== RosettaCode MediaWikAPI ===
RC runs on MediaWiki, and should have it's own REST API. Why not dog food it? https://www.rosettacode.org/mw/api.php
| |||