Anonymous user
Talk:Unicode strings: Difference between revisions
→New task description: reverting description
m (I haven't stated my "points of view".) |
(→New task description: reverting description) |
||
Line 48:
::: What "implementation"? You still don't get it. It's ''not'' a coding task. Let me say it again, it's '''not''' a coding task. It's a place where people can share their knowledge with others who are not familiar with a specific language. And I did say Unocode is complex, what more drawbacks do you need? Please stop trying to force everyone to agree with your narrow-minded point of view, and ''do'' discuss on talk page before you go around and change descriptions according to your feelings alone. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 20:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
:::: I haven't stated my "points of view". What are you talking about? The task description is currently neutral as I can see, and the task is in draft. [[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 20:25, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
:Given that Markhobley's edits didn't receive any support in past three days, I'm changing it back to original Q/A format. Also, "how well prepared" is ''the'' question for the task, it should not be in the suggestions list; encoding/normalization/canonization are in the same category, they should not be separated. Before you edit it again, please discuss here first. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 03:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
| |||