Talk:Type detection: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 53:
I may be missing something, but I haven't spotted a task that immediately looks like '''search a tree''' or '''search a nested list'''. If there is such a gap, I think that perhaps 'Type detection' could usefully be reworked and reframed (possibly retitled ?) to fill it. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 14:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
==Description doesn't match==
The task description mentioned at the top is a different task, not type detection (although one that may involve type detection), and it is the one implemented in zkl. The other three (JavaScript, OASYS Assembler, PHP) implement type detection. Some tasks are meant to explain features of the programming language (such as special symbols, naming conventions, etc), and this perhaps is similar, but nevertheless can be improved so that better explanation, examples, examples of usage, etc are possible. I think C++ has RTTI (although I don't really know as I do not program in C++). Haskell has the "Typeable" class for supporting type detection. --[[User:Zzo38|Zzo38]] ([[User talk:Zzo38|talk]]) 17:59, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
| |||