Talk:Type detection: Difference between revisions
Spam attempt ? Why set up facile non-tasks (easily contributed documentation consultation entries) using shared credentials ?
(Tasks like 'flattening a list' already demonstrate type-conditional divergence of evaluation (or flow) but "Type detection" would sometimes mislead.) |
(Spam attempt ? Why set up facile non-tasks (easily contributed documentation consultation entries) using shared credentials ?) |
||
Line 9:
:? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 17:47, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
: PS There are some existing tasks, like list flattening (http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Flatten_a_list) which already demonstrate type-conditional divergence of evaluation or flow. Perhaps "type detection", however, would either be too parochial (or simply misleading) as a description of what is happening in, for example, pattern matching. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 18:14, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
'''Spam attempt ?'''
:I notice that www.BugMeNot.com provides a login-control evasion service, by sharing ersatz login credentials.
:Would a bone fide editor make use of such a service ? The choice of lowest common denominator language, and the invitation to facile documentation consultation entries, rather than actual tasks, might conceivably be an attempt to set up pages which attracted instant content, in preparation for launching spam from a context which might delay deletion.
:Perhaps the user(s) of these shared BugMeNot credentials would like to allay our suspicions ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 13:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
| |||