Talk:Twin primes: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Thundergnat (talk | contribs) (What part of the task is about a conjecture?) |
(Deja vu all over again) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Conjecture? == |
== Conjecture? == |
||
So... what part of the task is about a conjecture? How is finding twin primes up to a finite number proving / disproving or even exercising Polignac's conjecture? Why is Conjecture even in the task title? --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 11:38, 26 July 2020 (UTC) |
So... what part of the task is about a conjecture? How is finding twin primes up to a finite number proving / disproving or even exercising Polignac's conjecture? Why is Conjecture even in the task title? --[[User:Thundergnat|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat|talk]]) 11:38, 26 July 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Deja vu all over again == |
|||
Did we not cover and become bored with this with Successive prime differences and Sexy Primes plus a further one the name of which I forget which was deleted as we had had enough?--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 14:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:38, 27 July 2020
Conjecture?
So... what part of the task is about a conjecture? How is finding twin primes up to a finite number proving / disproving or even exercising Polignac's conjecture? Why is Conjecture even in the task title? --Thundergnat (talk) 11:38, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
Deja vu all over again
Did we not cover and become bored with this with Successive prime differences and Sexy Primes plus a further one the name of which I forget which was deleted as we had had enough?--Nigel Galloway (talk) 14:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)