Talk:Truth table: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Inspiration: Response and new section) |
(→Which operators?: And, or, not is a useful set.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Which operators?== |
==Which operators?== |
||
Just to get ahead of a possible question, which operators should this program support? And, or, and not are pretty much locks, but do we need implication operators? Xor? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 13:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC) |
Just to get ahead of a possible question, which operators should this program support? And, or, and not are pretty much locks, but do we need implication operators? Xor? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 13:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
:And, or, not as a minimum; but if the rest are just more of the same then they could be left out for brevity. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 14:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:06, 31 October 2011
Inspiration
Inspired by a mention of truth tables here (Thanks Mike), which reminded me of an old blog post of mine. --Paddy3118 07:24, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- Always glad to inspire :). --Mwn3d 13:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Which operators?
Just to get ahead of a possible question, which operators should this program support? And, or, and not are pretty much locks, but do we need implication operators? Xor? --Mwn3d 13:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
- And, or, not as a minimum; but if the rest are just more of the same then they could be left out for brevity. --Paddy3118 14:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)