Talk:Truncatable primes: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with '== Is Zero allowed? == I think the task should explicitly state whether zero is allowed in the numbers or not. If allowed then 999907 is the largest left-truncatable prime less t…') |
(→Is Zero allowed?: Nope.) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
If allowed then 999907 is the largest left-truncatable prime less than 1000000. |
If allowed then 999907 is the largest left-truncatable prime less than 1000000. |
||
--[[User:Tikkanz|Tikkanz]] 00:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC) |
--[[User:Tikkanz|Tikkanz]] 00:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Thanks Tikkanz. I've disallowed zero as this is done in part of the Mathworld article. It means disallowing '07' as being a prime for example, and seems reasonable. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 03:27, 9 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:27, 9 September 2010
Is Zero allowed?
I think the task should explicitly state whether zero is allowed in the numbers or not. If allowed then 999907 is the largest left-truncatable prime less than 1000000. --Tikkanz 00:58, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Tikkanz. I've disallowed zero as this is done in part of the Mathworld article. It means disallowing '07' as being a prime for example, and seems reasonable. --Paddy3118 03:27, 9 September 2010 (UTC)