Talk:Triplet of three numbers: Difference between revisions
m
→Clarification please: Smiley and apology for failing to add signature earlier.
m (→Clarification please: Smiley and apology for failing to add signature earlier.) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 4:
: Added a comment to said entry. I'll also note that 6 entries say 46 found, 10 do not.
: I suspect there is a prime +4 +6 task knocking about somewhere that is effectively identical to this.
: Ah, obviously: [[Prime_triplets]] and/or [[Cousin_primes]] are ''so'' similar to this they should '''not''' be (a triplet of three) separate tasks. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]])
Also, "of three" is somewhat superfluous after "Triplet".
: Wait till you see the triplets of seven numbers task, now that promises to be difficult... --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 21:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
:: :) --[[User:Nig|Nig]] ([[User talk:Nig|talk]]) 22:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
''Addendum:'' My apologies. I was thinking so hard about creating my first new page this morning that I forgot to sign my enquiry. It was at 10:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC). --[[User:Nig|Nig]] ([[User talk:Nig|talk]]) 22:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
| |||