Anonymous user
Talk:Trigonometric functions: Difference between revisions
→Notes on precise sin implemented in Rexx: tried to make the use of more desired accuracy more plainly understood and eyecatching. -- ~~~~
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
(→Notes on precise sin implemented in Rexx: tried to make the use of more desired accuracy more plainly understood and eyecatching. -- ~~~~) |
||
Line 253:
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 07:51, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
: I don't understand, if you're discussing something that has no further relationship to the cited task, then why complain out the REXX example in the cited task? It isn't fair nor appropiate to use a subroutine taken out of context (i.e., not use the proglogue). Please re-read the REXX section (especially the boxed comments). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 19:49, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
: I went back and put the appropiate REXX header section comments in a box so it could be more easily read ''and'' catch one's attention. I don't know how to make it any more plainer or clearer than that. If one follows ''either'' of the two suggested techinques to accomodate the wanting of more accuracy, then all of the REXX example subroutines on the main page perform perfectly well with ''either'' technique and return precise results. To reiterate, if you want 30 "precise" digits, then specify '''numeric digits 40'''. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 19:49, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
| |||