Talk:Textonyms: Difference between revisions
→Correct number of Textonyms in unixdict.txt?
Line 64:
:::: Good point, I don't think I can mark it "inconsistent" instead of "incorrect" tho :). I think the task is fairly clear "#{3} is the number of #{2} which represent more than one word." Only 1473 of the 22903 numbers "represent more than one word". The task should probably have included a short example that made the "correct" output more obvious. From what little I can guess from the python code, I thought/assumed that "<tt>sum(1 for w in num2words if len(w) > 1)</tt>" was counting the entries where <tt>len(w) > 1</tt>; if it's instead summing the lengths I think must be a mistake/typo given the variable name itself is <tt>morethan1word</tt> (rather than something like <tt>pairsOfTextonyms</tt>). —[[User:dchapes|dchapes]] ([[User talk:dchapes|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/dchapes|contribs]]) 01:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
::::: When a digit combination is entered it maps to: A) Gibberish; B) An English word; C) Multiple English Words. Case C) are Textonyms. #{3} is the number of digit combinations which fall into category C). So 1473 is the correct answer.--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 15:33, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
| |||